
In the Roma Nova story, over four hundred Romans loyal to the old gods trekked north out of Italy in AD 395 to a semi-mountainous area similar to modern Slovenia.
Led by Apulius and his friend Mitelus at the head of twelve senatorial families, they established a colony based initially on land owned by Apulius’s Celtic father-in-law.
By purchase, alliance and conquest, this grew into Roma Nova, as portrayed in the modern era in the Roma Nova thrillers.
But what was that crumbling Roman world of AD 395 like that prompted the two friends to escape?
Rome – a tale of two cities
The Roman empire had changed in many ways since the time of Augustus nearly four hundred years before; the East, centred on the well fortified and connected Constantinople, continued to grow in importance as a centre of trade and imperial power while Rome itself diminished greatly in political importance.
 Ambrose barring Theodosius from Milan Cathedral, Anthony van Dyck, c. 1620 (Reckoned now to have been a greatly exaggerated event!)
Christianity was enforced as the official state religion; Theodosius had issued edicts during the 390s banning pagan religious practice, closing temples and dousing the sacred flame that had burnt for over a thousand years. Although the senatorial classes that Apulius and Mitelus belonged to held on to their traditions, across the empire the old pagan culture was disappearing.
The West outside Rome and other large cities, less urbanized with a spread-out populace, experienced economic decline throughout the Late Empire, especially in outlying provinces such as southern Italy, northern Gaul, Britain, to some extent Spain and the Danubian areas.
After emperor Gallienus banned senators from army commands in the mid-3rd century, the wealthy senatorial elite lost experience of, and interest in, military life. Sons did join the army – some senatorial families believed military experience in early adulthood made tougher men later – but they left early as the career path was blocked.
Unfortunately, as it headed towards the 5th century, the remaining landowning elite of the Roman senate not only largely barred its tenants from military service but also refused to approve sufficient funding for maintaining a sufficiently powerful mercenary army to defend the Western Empire. Not the best strategy ever. By AD 394, 200,000 soldiers guarded the borders with a reserve force of 50,000. Many of the non-Roman soldiers who made up these forces came from Germanic tribes: Alamanni, Franks, Goths, Saxons and Vandals.
 Historical Atlas, William R Shepherd, 1923
After AD 394, the new Western government installed by Theodosius I increasingly had to divert military resources from Britain and the Rhine to protect Italy. This, in turn, led to further rebellions and civil wars because the Western imperial government was not providing the military protection the northern provinces expected and needed against the barbarians.
As central power weakened, the state gradually lost control of its borders and farther-flung provinces, and with the Vandals conquering North Africa, it lost control over the Mediterranean Sea, the hallowed Mare Nostrum (‘Our Sea’). Basically, the imperial authorities had to cover too much ground with too few resources. In many places, Roman institutions collapsed along with economic stability. In some regions, such as Gaul and Italy, the settlement of ‘barbarians’ on former Roman lands seemed to be accepted and caused relatively little disruption.
 Gold solidus of Honorius 393-423 AD
Theodosius died in AD 395 at 48 years old and with him went the strong government imposed by his will. The empire split again into two, his sons Honorius took the West, and Arcadius the East.
The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control: the declining effectiveness and numbers of the army, lower agricultural yields, thus poorer health and numbers of the Roman population, less tax revenue from fewer productive lands, less frequent use of trading routes due to lower production of goods.
 Central European peasant house
Long-distance markets disappeared thus undermining the stability of the economy and its complexity, technological and engineering knowledge faded within a few generations, the whole compounded by the decreasing competence of the emperor, the religious upheavals, and diminishing efficiency of the civil administration, not to mention increasing pressure from ‘barbarians’ outside Roman culture.
As the once powerful empire fragmented, people reverted to more of a subsistence economy, to a greater degree of local production and consumption, rather than webs of commerce and specialised production Its society was unravelling, collapsing from inside. By AD 395 the Roman Empire was firmly on its way to becoming a failed state.
And for traditional Romans like Apulius, Mitelus and friends?
The Late Antique period saw a wholesale transformation of the political and social basis of life. The Roman citizen elite in the 2nd and 3rd centuries, under the pressure of taxation and the ruinous cost of presenting spectacular public entertainments in the traditional cursus honorum, had found under the Antonines that security could only be obtained by combining their established roles in the local town with new ones as servants and representatives of a distant Emperor and his travelling court.
After Constantine centralised the government in his new capital of Constantinople in AD 330, the Late Antique upper classes were divided among those who had access to that far-away centralised administration and those who did not. Although well-born and classically educated, election by the Senate to magistracies was no longer the path to success. Room at the top of Late Antique society involved increasingly intricate channels of access to the emperor.
 The Favourites of the Emperor Honorius, John William Waterhouse, 1883
 No more togas !
The plain toga that had identified all members of the Republican senatorial class had given way to the silk court vestments and jewellery that we associate with Byzantine imperial iconography. The imperial cabinet of advisors, the consistorium, was made up of those who were prepared to stand in courtly attendance upon their seated emperor, as distinct from the informal set of friends and advisors surrounding Augustus. Thus, Romans in the city of Rome like Apulius and Mitelus were stranded from power, yet caught by their inbred loyalty to the emperor.
In mainland Greece, the inhabitants of Sparta, Argos and Corinth abandoned their cities for fortified sites in nearby high places. In Italy, populations that had clustered within reach of Roman roads began to withdraw from them, as potential avenues of intrusion, and to rebuild in typically constricted fashion round an isolated fortified promontory, or rocca. In the Balkans, inhabited centres contracted and regrouped around a defensible acropolis, or were abandoned.
Thus, four hundred Romans trekking out of their once glorious, teeming and powerful city to a mountainous region in the north in order to preserve their way of life religion and culture was far from unusual. You can read why and how they went into voluntary exile in EXSILIUM.
The next trick was to survive.
————–
Book recommendation: The Fall of the Roman Empire and the End of Civilisation, Bryan Ward-Perkins, (Oxford University Press, 2005)
Updated 2023 and 2024: Alison Morton is the author of Roma Nova thrillers – INCEPTIO, CARINA (novella), PERFIDITAS, SUCCESSIO, AURELIA, NEXUS (novella), INSURRECTIO and RETALIO, and ROMA NOVA EXTRA, a collection of short stories. Audiobooks are available for four of the series. Double Identity, a contemporary conspiracy, starts a new series of thrillers. JULIA PRIMA, Roma Nova story set in the late 4th century, starts the Foundation stories. The sequel, EXSILIUM, is now out.
Download ‘Welcome to Alison Morton’s Thriller Worlds’, a FREE eBook, as a thank you gift when you sign up to Alison’s monthly email update. You’ll also be among the first to know about news and book progress before everybody else, and take part in giveaways.
If you enjoyed this post, do share it with your friends!Like this:Like Loading...
 The Pride of Romulus, late 16th century mural in the Palazzo Magnani, Bologna, part of the Histories of the Foundation of Rome by the Brothers Carracci (Public domain)
According to legend, early Rome was ruled by kings (reges) from 753-509 BC. Apparently. Every country needs a foundation legend, however lost in the mists it may be.
The king was said to have possessed absolute power over the people; no one could rule over him. The senate was a weak oligarchy, capable of exercising only minor administrative powers, so that Rome’s king was effectively an absolute monarch. The senate’s main function was to carry out and administer the wishes of the king.
After Romulus, Rome’s first legendary ruler, kings were elected by the people of Rome, sitting as a curiate assembly, who voted on the candidate that had been nominated by a chosen member of the senate called an interrex. A process fraught with potential corruption. (You can almost taste the conflict between sincere men of good intention and the chancers with money and/or influence or the biggest gang of bully-boys.)
Anyway, candidates for the throne could be chosen from any source; none of this ‘citizen of Rome’ malarky that would come later in the hierarchical Republic and Empire. Lucius Tarquinius Priscus, for example, who reigned c. 616-578 BC (38 years) was originally a migrant from a neighbouring Etruscan city-state. The people of Rome, sitting as the curiate assembly, could then either accept or reject the nominated candidate-king.
 Tarquin and Lucretia, Titian, 1571 (Public domain)
Well, the Romans became fed up with the antics of the last king, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus (534 – 509 BC). Tarquin was said to have been either the son or grandson of Lucius Tarquinius Priscus, the fifth king of Rome, and to have gained the throne through the murders of both his wife and his elder brother, followed by the assassination of his predecessor, Servius Tullius.
His subsequent reign was full of abuse of power, murder, seizing other people’s property and general bad behaviour. His son Sextus Tarquinius (also, confusingly, called Tarquin) raped the virtuous wife of a consul, Lucretia (as later depicted by Titian and the subject of the opera by Benjamin Britten), and Tarquin senior conspired with Rome’s arch enemy, Lars Porsena, in an attempt to recover his throne.
Senior Tarquin’s reign has been described as a tyranny that justified the abolition of the monarchy. The establishment of the Roman Republic from approx 509 BC led to a limited separation of powers (executive, justice, legislation) and the rise of the system of magistrates, senators, consuls, praetors, tribunes, etc. and the odd temporary dictator. But as we know, it wasn’t all plain sailing…
But such was the horror that Romans instinctively felt of returning to rule by kings that even Julius Caesar, the most powerful man of his time, and Augustus, the first to count as emperor in historians’ eyes, were never crowned as such. They and Roman heroes throughout the Republic wore many versions of laurel, oak leaf, grass or metal wreaths (coronae) at times as marks of distinction, but never went through anything resembling a coronation. (Yet the word ‘coronation’ derives from the Latin ‘corona’…)
But things moved on…
The corona radiata, the ‘radiant crown’ possibly worn by the Colossus of Rhodes as a representation of Helios, was worn by Roman emperors as part of the cult of Sol Invictus, part of the imperial cult as it developed during the 3rd century. So the origin of the crown has religious meaning, comparable to the significance of a halo, marking the sacral nature of such leadership, expressing that either the leader is himself divine, or ruling by divine right.
The precursor to the crown we know was the browband or headband called a diadem, which had been worn by the Achaemenid rulers, the ancient Iranian empire founded by Cyrus the Great in 550 BC. Constantine I, who became the ‘Dominate’ Roman emperor par excellence in the early fourth century decided to adopt it as a symbol of his absolute power.
 Gold medallion showing Constantine I wearing a jewelled diadem. Struck at Nicomedia in 336–337 AD to celebrate the 30th anniversary of his rule
The Dominate system of government emerged as a response to the chaos that of the crisis of the third century. The chronic usurpations, military insurrections, simultaneous military conflicts across multiple frontiers exposed the weaknesses in the Roman state as governed under the classic Principate imperial system.
After AD 285 a gradual but relentless move began from the collegiate model of government to a more autocratic version. The senatorial elite began to be excluded from high military commands and the equestrians (middle ranking aristocrats/upper middle class) became more important in government and the military.
The army was reorganised, imperial dress changed from simpler tunics and togas to (often ornate) robes and pallia, and ceremonial displays became more extravagant. Religious policy aimed at religious unity and large scale monetary reforms and the creation of an empire-wide civil bureaucracy became the norm.
Following the assumption of the diadem by Constantine, Roman and Byzantine emperors continued to wear it as the supreme symbol of their authority. Although no specific coronation ceremony was observed at first, one gradually evolved over the following century. Even Emperor Julian the Apostate/Philosopher who yearned for the values, religion and behaviour of earlier Roman times, was hoisted upon a shield and crowned with a gold necklace provided by one of his standard-bearers; he later wore a jewel-studded diadem.
Later emperors were crowned and acclaimed in a similar manner until the momentous decision was taken to permit the patriarch of Constantinople to physically place the crown on the emperor’s head.
The first imperial coronation was organised by Leo I, who was crowned by Patriarch Anatolius of Constantinople in 457 AD. This Christian coronation ritual was performed by almost all future emperors and later imitated by courts all over Europe.
And, as they say, the rest is history.
Alison Morton is the author of Roma Nova thrillers – INCEPTIO, CARINA (novella), PERFIDITAS, SUCCESSIO, AURELIA, NEXUS (novella), INSURRECTIO and RETALIO, and ROMA NOVA EXTRA, a collection of short stories. Audiobooks are available for four of the series. Double Identity, a contemporary conspiracy, starts a new series of thrillers. JULIA PRIMA, a new Roma Nova story set in the late 4th century, is now out.
Download ‘Welcome to Alison Morton’s Thriller Worlds’, a FREE eBook, as a thank you gift when you sign up to Alison’s monthly email update. You’ll also be among the first to know about news and book progress before everybody else, and take part in giveaways.
If you enjoyed this post, do share it with your friends!Like this:Like Loading...
 3rd century gold necklace set with amethysts, stones linked with peltae (Shields used by Amazon women warriors)
During my visit to the UK, I went for my usual research day at the British Museum. This time, I was looking at Roman jewellery, specifically Late Antiquity/early Eastern Roman (Byzantine).
While fashions change as new cultural preferences develop, no one historical period suddenly stops and another begins.
People were still wearing a tunic as their main garment and a top covering as a form of wrap or even cloak in AD 400 as they did in Augustus’s time in the first century AD.
Inevitably, styles and names evolved. Roman enthusiasts may be sad to hear that the segmented armour and toga had gone out and trousers were in by the end of the fourth century and actually, all these tendencies started earlier. Both sexes wore more elaborately decorated tunics with embroidery and wide stripes of decorations. Women wore a floor length, wide-sleeved tunic called a dalmatica, not a stola.
 Necklace and earrings from AD 400 Carthage, rock emeralds, sapphires and pearls on gold wire
Jewellery designs changed with influence from other peoples such as Germanic tribes – Alemanni, Goths, Franks, but the principles of necklace, brooches, rings, buckles and bracelets stayed constant. Designs, metals and gemstones for Romans in the Empire didn’t really change that radically, but as ‘barbarian’ and elaborate eastern influences and craftmanship became stronger and took over the West, preferences grew towards the heavier and more elaborate jewellery came to dominate.
 Gold chain with openwork pendant sent with emeralds sapphire and pearls. Approximately AD 600.
The Etruscan, Roman and post Roman rooms are fascinating and I heartily recommend a visit to the museum if you are in London. It’s an enormous (and popular) place and it’s best to go with a plan!
 Gold crescent earrings around 600 AD
More about the museum https://www.britishmuseum.org/
I can’t finish without showing you my favourite earrings from the visit. Also dated to around AD 600, they show the classic hoop popular for many decades, but overlaid with a more elaborate Eastern Roman decoration on the lower crescent.
All photos are mine, taken with my iPhone through the glass cases. Apologies for any reflections.
Alison Morton is the author of Roma Nova thrillers – INCEPTIO, CARINA (novella), PERFIDITAS, SUCCESSIO, AURELIA, NEXUS (novella), INSURRECTIO and RETALIO, and ROMA NOVA EXTRA, a collection of short stories. Audiobooks are available for four of the series. Double Identity, a contemporary conspiracy, starts a new series of thrillers. JULIA PRIMA, a new Roma Nova story set in the late 4th century, is now out.
Download ‘Welcome to Alison Morton’s Thriller Worlds’, a FREE eBook, as a thank you gift when you sign up to Alison’s monthly email update. You’ll also be among the first to know about news and book progress before everybody else, and take part in giveaways.
If you enjoyed this post, do share it with your friends!Like this:Like Loading...
|
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 37 other subscribers.
Buy AURELIA from Apple!
UK

US
|